Why Customer Service now Defines Differentiation in the Energy Sector

The challenges in the energy sector are real

The challenges facing the energy sector are well known and deeply felt by everyone working within it. Grid constraints, regulatory pressure, volatile markets and rising expectations all converge at the same time. None of this is easy to solve and certainly not in the short term.

As a result, the majority of investments are channelled into infrastructure. Strengthening and modernising the grid is not optional. It’s a prerequisite for stability, security of supply and long-term resilience.

Yet this focus also creates a blind spot. While billions are spent on assets customers never directly see, the part of the business they interact with most often — customer service — is frequently deprioritised. Not intentionally, but structurally. And that imbalance is becoming increasingly visible.

Customers don’t see the grid but they feel the experience

From an internal perspective, everything in an energy company revolves around infrastructure. From a customer’s perspective, the grid is invisible. What customers actually experience are interactions. Moments where something works or doesn’t. These moments show up in very practical ways:

– Bills that are difficult to understand
– Long waiting times
– Having to repeat the same issue multiple times
– Receiving different answers depending on who they speak to

Individually, these issues may appear minor. Together, they define how customers perceive an energy provider. In practice, this becomes most obvious when something goes wrong. A billing issue, a delayed connection, an unexpected outage. In these moments, customer service does not just support the company it represents it. Customer service is the company.

The service paradox

There is a structural paradox at the heart of the energy sector. A stable grid is essential but it’s also expected. Customers take it for granted. It rarely creates loyalty, it seldom generates trust and no one praises an energy provider for a day without outages.

What is remembered are negative experiences. One frustrating service interaction can shape perception for years. This creates a significant imbalance:

— Investment flows into areas customers do not see
— Perception is shaped by areas that often receive less attention

Energy customer service, not infrastructure, increasingly defines reputation.

When complexity meets the customer

Across many energy providers, one pattern repeats itself. Internally, companies manage immense complexity with precision. Regulatory requirements, market rules and legacy systems are orchestrated with care. But translating that complexity into a clear, coherent customer experience remains a challenge.

In transformation projects across the sector, we often see the same friction points:

— Systems that are not connected end-to-end
— Service agents switching between multiple tools
— Process breaks passed on to customers

The result is a lack of coherence that customers feel immediately.

The gap is measurable (and growing)

The gap between operational complexity and customer experience is not anecdotal. The numbers are clear. Even in highly regulated energy markets, customer service satisfaction remains consistently low. Recent regulatory data shows that overall satisfaction sits at around 66%, a level that falls short of customer expectations for such an essential service.

Among dissatisfied customers, the pain points are strikingly basic: 42% report difficulties simply reaching customer support, while 36% are dissatisfied with how long it takes to resolve their issue (Ofgem). Accessibility still the standout friction point. Only around two-thirds of customers say it’s easy to contact their energy provider, meaning one in three already starts their interaction with a negative experience.

The broader trend is equally concerning. Industry-wide studies indicate that customer satisfaction in the energy sector is declining rather than improving, reaching its lowest recorded level in recent years.

What makes this moment particularly striking is the performance gap between providers. Satisfaction scores range widely — from the mid-60s to above 80 — showing that better service is clearly possible, but not consistently delivered. The gap between top and bottom performers shows that this is not a structural limitation, it’s an execution problem.

Where competition actually plays out

Many structural challenges in the energy sector will take years to resolve. Grid expansion, market reform and regulatory alignment are long-term endeavours. Customer service, however, operates in the here and now.

Customers will reach out, that’s inevitable. The question is what happens when they do. This is where the real competitive differences start to show. And for many providers, the biggest weakness is the contact centre.

Rethinking the role of customer service

Despite its impact, customer service is still often treated primarily as a cost factor. Something to optimise, reduce or externalise. That mindset no longer reflects today’s reality. Customer service is the point where expectations meet delivery. It’s where trust is either strengthened or eroded. And it is one of the few areas where strategic changes can be implemented relatively quickly. In the energy sector, treating customer service as a mere support function is becoming increasingly risky.

From cost centre to strategic capability

Leading energy providers are beginning to rethink service fundamentally. Instead of a reactive unit, they’re seeing the contact centre as a strategic lever for competitiveness:

— A sensor for customer sentiment
— A driver of loyalty and retention
— A critical interface between systems and people

In practice, this means rethinking processes end-to-end, integrating data more effectively and empowering agents with better tools and clearer decision paths that make service excellence something built around action, not scripts.

Speed matters more than perfection

There is no such thing as a perfect energy system and customers know that. What they expect is transparency, responsiveness and a sense of being taken seriously when things don’t go as planned. Speed plays a critical role here. Fast, clear resolution often matters more than perfect solutions delivered too late.

When issues are handled well, even negative events can strengthen trust. When they aren’t, they linger. Customers don’t expect perfection. They do expect professionalism and proactivity when dealing with imperfection.

What good service looks like in practice

A good example of this shift can already be seen outside the energy sector.

At Flender, IBM iX helped improve customer service by implementing an AI Service Agent designed to simplify service processes and make lead handling more efficient. The challenge was familiar: customers needed faster answers, internal teams were overloaded and service requests often passed through multiple handovers before reaching the right person.

Instead of treating service as a purely reactive support function, the focus shifted to better orchestration. By connecting customer data, service processes and intelligent routing, requests could be handled faster with fewer manual breaks and less internal friction.

The result wasn’t just more efficiency, but a noticeably better customer experience. Exactly the shift energy providers need to make. Not by replacing systems, but by connecting them and by treating customer touchpoint as a strategic capability.

Customer service sits at the intersection of systems, processes and human behaviour. That’s why improving service is rarely just a technology project. It requires a holistic approach. One that connects infrastructure, operational processes and the actual customer experience.

The opportunity ahead

The real opportunity for energy providers lies in handling customer problems better than anyone else. That requires, connected systems, clear processes and a deliberate focus on the customer perspective. The risks aren’t theoretical anymore, they are urgent. But the path forward can be practical.

Share